Rule of 5: It Is Not Just About the Destructor

For resource managing in classes, do not think that move will always move. It will fallback to copy if the object is not moveable. Or if the operation throws an exception, it will fall back to copy as well, so always mark the move constructor as noexcept as we saw on the previous blog about move semantics. struct MyClass{ std::vector<int> m_data; ~MyClass() = default; }; Given the above class, consider the below lines: ...

June 16, 2026 · 4 min · 701 words

C++ Move Semantics: Why 'noexcept' is mandatory for High-Performance Containers

Ideally, we should never throw on the move Constructor of an object. If a move constructor throws an exception while a vector is resizing, the vector is in a “broken” state: half of the elements are in the new memory, and half are in the old memory. Move operations often modify the source object (leaving it empty or null), making it dangerous to undo the changes. Therefore, the compiler wants to avoid this risk and uses a copy rather than a movment. We want to avoid this, and the way to do this is to declare the move constructor as noexcept. Like this, we give the promise that we do not throw, and the compiler can safely use it. ...

December 29, 2025 · 3 min · 624 words